WIP: feat: Namespaced includes
WIP: feat: Namespaced includes
After talking with @jakehamilton, we decided not to go forward with this PR, because:
- We don't see it being extremely useful for now. It's pretty rare to include so many modules that their…
WIP: feat: Namespaced includes
I just pushed commits that should resolve previous discussions, but I have some questions/notes:
- I have made include objects require a
module
key, so that attrs modules included inline can't…
WIP: feat: Namespaced includes
I think composition is still partially unresolved, but given this was just the first draft I came up with I expect it to have some rough edges, particularly in that domain.
The way it work for…
WIP: feat: Namespaced includes
I'm not sure what you're referring to as "this", if it's something specific I'm not seeing it (maybe I'm confused by the UI).
If it's in general, what's the rationale for modules to be included…
feat: Namespaced includes